Integrating multisector molecular characterization into personalized peptide vaccine design for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research by Tanner M Johanns, Elizabeth A R Garfinkle, Katherine E Miller, Alexandra J Livingstone, Kaleigh F Roberts, Lakshmi Prakruthi Rao Venkata, Joshua L Dowling, Michael R Chicoine, Ralph G Dacey, Gregory J Zipfel, Albert H Kim, Elaine R Mardis, Gavin P Dunn

TLDR

  • The study is about a new way to treat a type of brain tumor called Glioblastoma (GBM). GBM patients don't respond well to current treatments like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The study uses a new approach called personalized peptide vaccines called NeoVax. NeoVax is made by taking a sample of the patient's tumor and using it to identify targetable antigens. These antigens are then incorporated into personalized peptide vaccines. The study enrolls four patients onto the NeoVax clinical trial and assesses immune reactivity to NeoVax neoantigens in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-NeoVax using an IFNg-ELISPOT assay. The study finds that NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells. The study also finds evidence of infiltrating, clonally expanded T cells in a post-NeoVax tumor biopsy. The study's findings suggest that NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells and provide encouraging results to aid in the development of future neoantigen vaccine-based clinical trials in patients with GBM. The study's limitations include a small sample size and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) patient outcomes remain poor despite multimodality treatment with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. There are few immunotherapy options due to the lack of tumor immunogenicity. Several clinical trials have reported promising results with cancer vaccines. To date, studies have used data from a single tumor site to identify targetable antigens, but this approach limits the antigen pool and is antithetical to the heterogeneity of GBM. We have implemented multisector sequencing to increase the pool of neoantigens across the GBM genomic landscape that can be incorporated into personalized peptide vaccines called NeoVax. Here, we report the findings of four subjects enrolled onto the NeoVax clinical trial (NCT0342209). Immune reactivity to NeoVax neoantigens was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-NeoVax for subjects 1-3 using IFNg-ELISPOT assay. A statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens was observed. Furthermore, a post-NeoVax tumor biopsy was obtained from subject 3 and, upon evaluation, revealed evidence of infiltrating, clonally expanded T cells. Collectively, our findings suggest NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells and provide encouraging results to aid in the development of future neoantigen vaccine-based clinical trials in patients with GBM. Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating multisector sampling in cancer vaccine design and provide information on the clinical applicability of clonality, distribution, and immunogenicity of the neoantigen landscape in GBM patients.

Overview

  • The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of personalized peptide vaccines called NeoVax in stimulating expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells in GBM patients. The study uses multisector sequencing to increase the pool of neoantigens across the GBM genomic landscape that can be incorporated into personalized peptide vaccines. The study enrolls four subjects onto the NeoVax clinical trial (NCT0342209) and assesses immune reactivity to NeoVax neoantigens in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-NeoVax using IFNg-ELISPOT assay. A statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens was observed. Additionally, a post-NeoVax tumor biopsy was obtained from subject 3 and revealed evidence of infiltrating, clonally expanded T cells. The study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating multisector sampling in cancer vaccine design and provides information on the clinical applicability of clonality, distribution, and immunogenicity of the neoantigen landscape in GBM patients. The hypothesis being tested is whether NeoVax can stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells in GBM patients. The methodology used for the experiment includes multisector sequencing to identify targetable antigens, personalized peptide vaccines called NeoVax, and an IFNg-ELISPOT assay to assess immune reactivity to NeoVax neoantigens in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-NeoVax. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of NeoVax in stimulating expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells in GBM patients. The study aims to answer the question of whether NeoVax can be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients. The study's findings suggest that NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells and provide encouraging results to aid in the development of future neoantigen vaccine-based clinical trials in patients with GBM. The study's limitations include a small sample size and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. Future research directions could include expanding the study population, incorporating additional immunological assays, and investigating the long-term efficacy of NeoVax in GBM patients. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease. The study's future directions include expanding the study population, incorporating additional immunological assays, and investigating the long-term efficacy of NeoVax in GBM patients. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • The study compares the outcomes observed under different experimental conditions or interventions detailed in the study. The study assesses immune reactivity to NeoVax neoantigens in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-NeoVax using IFNg-ELISPOT assay. A statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens was observed. Additionally, a post-NeoVax tumor biopsy was obtained from subject 3 and revealed evidence of infiltrating, clonally expanded T cells. The study identifies a significant difference in the results between the pre- and post-NeoVax time points, with a statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens. The study also identifies a significant difference in the results between the pre- and post-NeoVax time points, with a statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens. The study's findings suggest that NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells. The study's key findings include a statistically significant increase in IFNg producing T cells at the post-NeoVax time point for several neoantigens and evidence of infiltrating, clonally expanded T cells in a post-NeoVax tumor biopsy. The study's findings provide encouraging results to aid in the development of future neoantigen vaccine-based clinical trials in patients with GBM. The study's limitations include a small sample size and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study's findings have significant implications for the field of research or clinical practice. The study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating multisector sampling in cancer vaccine design and provides information on the clinical applicability of clonality, distribution, and immunogenicity of the neoantigen landscape in GBM patients. The study's findings suggest that NeoVax did stimulate expansion of neoantigen-specific effector T cells and provide encouraging results to aid in the development of future neoantigen vaccine-based clinical trials in patients with GBM. The study's limitations include a small sample size and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease. The study's future directions include expanding the study population, incorporating additional immunological assays, and investigating the long-term efficacy of NeoVax in GBM patients. The study's limitations include a small sample size and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's implications include the potential for NeoVax to be used as an effective immunotherapy option for GBM patients and the need for further research to validate the findings in a larger cohort. The study's significance lies in its potential to improve the outcomes of GBM patients and provide a new approach to immunotherapy for this disease.