in The American journal of clinical nutrition by Gary E Fraser, Fayth M Butler, David J Shavlik, Roy O Mathew, Jisoo Oh, Rawiwan Sirirat, Dmitry Abramov, Lars E Sveen
Associations between vegetarian diets and risk of common cancers are somewhat understood, but such data on medium frequency cancers is scarce and often imprecise. To describe multivariable-adjusted associations between different types of vegetarian diets (compared with non-vegetarians) and risk of cancers at different bodily sites. The Adventist Health Study (AHS-2) is a cohort of 95863 North American Seventh-day Adventists, established between 2002-2007. These analyses used 79,468 participants initially free of cancer. Baseline dietary data were obtained using a food frequency questionnaire, and incident cancers by matching with state and Canadian provincial cancer registries. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using proportional hazards regression. Small amounts of missing data were filled using multiple imputation. Over all cancers, all vegetarians combined compared to non-vegetarians, had HR=0.88 (95% CI 0.83,0.93; p<0.001), and for medium frequency cancers HR=0.82 (95% CI 0.76, 0.89; p<0.001). Of specific cancers, colorectal HR=0.79 (95% CI 0.66, 0.95; p=0.011), stomach HR=0.55 (95% CI 0.32, 0.93; p=0.025), and lymphoproliferative HR=0.75 (95% CI 0.60,0.93; p=0.010) cancers, were significantly less frequent among vegetarians. A joint test that HR=1.0 for all vegetarian subtypes compared with non-vegetarians, was rejected for cancers of the breast (p=0.012), lymphoma (p=0.031), all lymphoproliferative cancers (p=0.004), prostate cancer (p=0.030), colorectal cancers (p=0.023), medium frequency cancers (p<0.001), and for all cancers combined (p<0.001). These data indicate lower risk in vegetarians for all cancers combined, also for medium frequency cancers as a group. Specific cancers with evidence of lower risk, are breast, colorectal, prostate, stomach, and lymphoproliferative subtypes. Risk at some other sites may also differ in vegetarians, but statistical power was limited.