The comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of two distinct manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma under EUS.

in Endoscopic ultrasound by Shanshan Liu, Chaoqun Han, Qi He, Guochen Shang, Yu Jin, Jun Liu, Zhen Ding, Rong Lin

TLDR

  • The study found that two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) have different clinicopathological characteristics.
  • Type 1 patients tended to develop GSRCC at an older age, had higher serum levels of tumor markers, and exhibited more advanced disease features.
  • The study suggests that the two subtypes may require different management strategies.

Abstract

There are two different endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC). No studies have been reported on the differences in the clinical profiles of patients based on EUS examination. We aim to study the variations in clinicopathological characteristics between two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of GSRCC. A total of 302 patients with GSRCC confirmed by pathological examination who underwent EUS were enrolled in the study. Based on the endoscopic ultrasonographic features, patients were categorized into two groups: type 1, where the entire layer structure disappeared, and type 2, where the layer structure was still present and appeared lymphomatoid. Clinicopathologic features were collected retrospectively and analyzed. Compared with type 2 patients, type 1 patients tended to develop GSRCC at an older age (= 0.033) and had higher serum levels of tumor markers and were more likely to experience anemia (< 0.001) and weight loss (< 0.001) during the disease progression. Significant increases in the tumor size (< 0.001), thickness of the affected gastric wall (< 0.001), and depth of tumor invasion (< 0.001) were observed in type 1 patients. Furthermore, type 1 patients had higher prevalence of affected blood vessels (< 0.001), nerves (< 0.001), lymph nodes (< 0.001), and peritoneal metastasis (< 0.001). However, no difference was found in the duration of disease between the two groups, and all deficient mismatch repairs were observed in type 1 patients. The two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of GSRCC exhibited different clinicopathological characteristics, suggesting that they may represent different subtypes of the disease that require special attention in management strategies.

Overview

  • The study aimed to investigate the variations in clinicopathological characteristics between two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC).
  • A total of 302 patients with GSRCC confirmed by pathological examination who underwent EUS were enrolled in the study.
  • The study categorized patients into two groups based on the endoscopic ultrasonographic features: type 1, where the entire layer structure disappeared, and type 2, where the layer structure was still present and appeared lymphomatoid.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • Compared to type 2 patients, type 1 patients tended to develop GSRCC at an older age and had higher serum levels of tumor markers.
  • Type 1 patients were more likely to experience anemia and weight loss during the disease progression.
  • Type 1 patients had significant increases in tumor size, thickness of affected gastric wall, and depth of tumor invasion, and had a higher prevalence of affected blood vessels, nerves, lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastasis.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study suggests that the two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of GSRCC may represent different subtypes of the disease that require special attention in management strategies.
  • Further studies are needed to confirm the findings and to explore the underlying mechanisms of the differences between the two subtypes.
  • Elucidating the clinicopathological characteristics of GSRCC may improve patient outcomes and provide a basis for personalized treatment strategies.