Quality-of-life endpoints collection, reporting, and framing in randomised trials of indolent lymphomas: a systematic review.

in The Lancet. Haematology by Charles J Milrod, Lila Rubin, Boris Martinez, Thomas A Ollila, Adam J Olszewski, Ari Pelcovits

TLDR

  • This systematic review finds that QOL outcomes are underreported in randomized controlled trials of indolent lymphomas, and highlights the need for transparent QOL reporting to improve patient-centred care.

Abstract

Indolent lymphomas are generally incurable, with protracted disease courses. The approval of drug treatment options often relies on surrogate endpoints (eg, progression-free survival), which do not capture patient-centred outcomes such as quality of life (QOL). This systematic review characterises the use of QOL as an endpoint in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of indolent lymphomas, and the association of QOL with survival outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched from database inception to May 20, 2024, for phase 3 RCTs of indolent lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. 103 RCTs met eligibility criteria. Data on QOL endpoints were collected in 53 (51%) of 103 trials, but reported in only 25 (24%). Improvements in QOL was reported in 11 (44%) of these RCTs, and these trials were more likely to show progression-free survival and overall survival benefits. We found that trials with neutral or worsened QOL outcomes often framed the results positively, presenting QOL data as supporting treatment use. This systematic review highlights that data on QOL endpoints are undercollected, under-reported, and often positively framed despite a lack of improvement, underscoring the need for transparent QOL reporting to enhance patient-centred care.

Overview

  • This systematic review examines the use of quality of life (QOL) as an endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indolent lymphomas, and its association with survival outcomes.
  • The review searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase 3 RCTs of indolent lymphomas and collected data on QOL endpoints from 103 eligible trials.
  • The study aims to highlight the need for transparent QOL reporting to enhance patient-centred care in the treatment of indolent lymphomas.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • Only 51% of trials (53/103) collected data on QOL endpoints, but only 24% (25/103) reported QOL outcomes.
  • Among the 53 trials that collected QOL data, 44% (11/25) reported improvements in QOL, and these trials were more likely to show progression-free survival and overall survival benefits.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study highlights the need for transparent QOL reporting to enhance patient-centred care, as current reporting is undercollected, under-reported, and often positively framed.