Efficacy of Adding Veliparib to Temozolomide for Patients With MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

in JAMA oncology by Jann N Sarkaria, Karla V Ballman, Sani H Kizilbash, Erik P Sulman, Caterina Giannini, Bret B Friday, Nicholas A Butowski, Nimish A Mohile, David E Piccioni, James D Battiste, Jan Drappatz, Jian L Campian, Sandeep Mashru, Kurt A Jaeckle, Barbara J O'Brien, Jesse G Dixon, Brian F Kabat, Nadia L Laack, Leland S Hu, Timothy Kaufmann, Priya Kumthekar, Benjamin M Ellingson, S Keith Anderson, Evanthia Galanis

TLDR

  • A clinical trial evaluated the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and MGMT promoter hypermethylation, but found that adding veliparib did not significantly extend overall survival.

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields. To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023. Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles. The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS). There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm (P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects. This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-hypermethylated glioblastoma. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982.

Overview

  • The study aimed to evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation, building on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of veliparib when combined with temozolomide.
  • Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled and randomized to receive standard adjuvant temozolomide with either placebo or veliparib.
  • The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the study aimed to determine whether adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide would significantly extend OS in this patient population.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • The median OS was 24.8 months for the placebo arm and 28.1 months for the veliparib arm, but the difference did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point.
  • However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up.
  • The experimental combination was well tolerated, with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-hypermethylated glioblastoma, which may impact future treatment strategies for this patient population.
  • Future studies could explore alternative combinations or sequences of therapies to improve outcomes for glioblastoma patients.
  • Additionally, further research may be needed to understand the optimal dosing and duration of veliparib treatment for this patient population.