Safety and Outcomes of Combined Pancreatic and Hepatic Resections for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

in Annals of surgical oncology by Hallbera Gudmundsdottir, Ron Pery, Rondell P Graham, Cornelius A Thiels, Susanne G Warner, Rory L Smoot, Mark J Truty, Michael L Kendrick, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Elizabeth B Habermann, David M Nagorney, Sean P Cleary

TLDR

  • The study looked at patients with pancreatic cancer that had spread to other parts of the body. Some of these patients had both pancreatic and liver tumors. The study compared the outcomes of patients who had both pancreatic and liver tumors and those who only had liver tumors. The study found that patients with both pancreatic and liver tumors had more liver tumors, but they had similar rates of complications and mortality compared to those with only liver tumors. The study also found that the 5-year survival rate was similar for both groups. The study highlights that it is possible to perform surgery on patients with both pancreatic and liver tumors with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions. Future research should focus on identifying the best way to select patients for this type of surgery and evaluating the long-term outcomes of these patients. Additionally, studies should explore the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing combined resections.

Abstract

Approximately 40-50% of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) initially present with distant metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for this indication. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Major pancreatectomy was defined as pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, and major hepatectomy as right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy were compared with those of patients who underwent isolated hepatectomy (with or without prior history of pancreatectomy). 205 patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs were identified: 131 underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy and 74 underwent isolated hepatectomy. Among patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy, 89 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 11 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 30 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy, and 1 patient underwent major pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy. Patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008), but the groups were otherwise similar. Rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8-7.6% vs. 1.4-12%, p = 0.30-0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) were similar between the two groups. 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93). For patients with metastatic pNETs, combined pancreatic and hepatic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions.

Overview

  • The study aims to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) with those of patients undergoing isolated hepatectomy (with or without prior history of pancreatectomy).
  • The study uses a retrospective review of patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2020. Major pancreatectomy is defined as pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, and major hepatectomy as right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy are compared with those of patients who underwent isolated hepatectomy. 205 patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs were identified: 131 underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy and 74 underwent isolated hepatectomy. Among patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy, 89 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 11 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 30 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy, and 1 patient underwent major pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy. Patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008), but the groups were otherwise similar. Rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8-7.6% vs. 1.4-12%, p = 0.30-0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) were similar between the two groups. 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93).

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • The study found that patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for metastatic pNETs had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008) but had similar rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8-7.6% vs. 1.4-12%, p = 0.30-0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) compared to patients undergoing isolated hepatectomy. The 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93).

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study highlights the feasibility of performing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for metastatic pNETs with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions. Future research should focus on identifying the optimal patient selection criteria for combined resections and evaluating the long-term outcomes of these patients. Additionally, studies should explore the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing combined resections.