The clinical dilemma of JAK inhibitor failure in myelofibrosis: Predictive characteristics and outcomes.

in Cancer by John O Mascarenhas, Srdan Verstovsek

TLDR

  • The study explores the use of non-JAKi agents in patients with high-risk myelofibrosis, aiming to address the high unmet therapeutic need and improve outcomes.

Abstract

Two Janus-associated kinase inhibitors (JAKi) (initially ruxolitinib and, more recently, fedratinib) have been approved as treatment options for patients who have intermediate-risk and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF), with pivotal trials demonstrating improvements in spleen volume, disease symptoms, and quality of life. At the same time, however, clinical trial experiences with JAKi agents in MF have demonstrated a high frequency of discontinuations because of adverse events or progressive disease. In addition, overall survival benefits and clinical and molecular predictors of response have not been established in this population, for which the disease burden is high and treatment options are limited. Consistently poor outcomes have been documented after JAKi discontinuation, with survival durations after ruxolitinib ranging from 11 to 16 months across several studies. To address such a high unmet therapeutic need, various non-JAKi agents are being actively explored (in combination with ruxolitinib in first-line or salvage settings and/or as monotherapy in JAKi-pretreated patients) in phase 3 clinical trials, including pelabresib (a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor), navitoclax (a B-cell lymphoma 2/B-cell lymphoma 2-xL inhibitor), parsaclisib (a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor), navtemadlin (formerly KRT-232; a murine double-minute chromosome 2 inhibitor), and imetelstat (a telomerase inhibitor). The breadth of data expected from these trials will provide insight into the ability of non-JAKi treatments to modify the natural history of MF.

Overview

  • The study focuses on exploring non-Janus-associated kinase inhibitors (JAKi) agents as treatment options for patients with high-risk myelofibrosis (MF).
  • The study aims to address the high unmet therapeutic need in MF, a disease with limited treatment options and poor outcomes after JAKi discontinuation.
  • Several phase 3 clinical trials are currently investigating non-JAKi agents in combination with ruxolitinib or as monotherapy in JAKi-pretreated patients.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • JAKi agents have demonstrated improvements in spleen volume, disease symptoms, and quality of life in pivotal trials for patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk MF.
  • Despite these improvements, JAKi agents have a high frequency of discontinuations due to adverse events or progressive disease, and overall survival benefits have not been established.
  • Poor outcomes have been documented after JAKi discontinuation, with survival durations ranging from 11 to 16 months across several studies.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The exploration of non-JAKi agents offers new potential treatment options for patients with high-risk MF, addressing the high unmet therapeutic need in this disease.
  • The phase 3 clinical trials currently underway aim to provide insights into the ability of non-JAKi treatments to modify the natural history of MF.
  • Future research directions may involve investigating the optimal combination of non-JAKi agents, identifying clinical and molecular predictors of response, and monitoring long-term outcomes.