Streamlined intraoperative brain tumor classification and molecular subtyping in stereotactic biopsies using stimulated Raman histology and deep learning.

in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research by David Reinecke, Daniel Ruess, Anna-Katharina Meissner, Gina Fürtjes, Niklas von Spreckelsen, Adrian Ion-Margineau, Florian Khalid, Tobias Blau, Thomas Stehle, Abdulkader Al-Shughri, Reinhard Büttner, Roland Goldbrunner, Maximilian I Ruge, Volker Neuschmelting

TLDR

  • This study looked at how well AI algorithms could help doctors make quick decisions about brain tumors during small surgeries. The AI algorithms looked at pictures of the brain tissue and could tell if it was healthy or not. The study also looked at how much tissue was needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The results showed that the AI algorithms were just as good as frozen section analysis in detecting and subclassifying brain tumors during small surgeries once a certain amount of tissue was squeezed out. The study also showed that the AI algorithms could tell if the brain tumor was a certain type, which could help doctors make faster treatment decisions in the future. However, more work needs to be done to make sure the AI algorithms are safe and effective for long-term use.

Abstract

Recent artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms aided intraoperative decision-making via stimulated Raman histology (SRH) during craniotomy. This study assesses deep-learning algorithms for rapid intraoperative diagnosis from SRH images in small stereotactic-guided brain biopsies. It defines a minimum tissue sample size threshold to ensure diagnostic accuracy. A prospective single-center study examined 121 SRH images from 84 patients with unclear intracranial lesions undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy. Unprocessed, label-free samples were imaged with a portable fiber-laser Raman scattering microscope. Three deep-learning models were tested to (I) identify tumorous/non-tumorous tissue as qualitative biopsy control, (II) subclassify into high-grade glioma (CNS WHO grade 4), diffuse low-grade glioma (CNS WHO grade 2-3), metastases, lymphoma, or gliosis, and (III) molecularly subtype IDH- and 1p/19q-status of adult-type diffuse gliomas. Model predictions were evaluated against frozen section analysis and final neuropathological diagnoses. The first model identified tumorous/non-tumorous tissue with 91.7% accuracy. Sample size on slides impacted accuracy in brain tumor subclassification (81.6%, κ=0.72 frozen section; 73.9%, κ=0.61 second model), with SRH being smaller than H&E (4.1±2.5mm² vs 16.7±8.2mm², p<0.001). SRH images with over 140 high-quality patches and a mean squeezed sample of 5.26mm² yielded 89.5% accuracy in subclassification and 93.9% in molecular subtyping of adult-type diffuse gliomas. AI-based SRH image analysis is non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting and subclassifying brain tumors during small stereotactic-guided biopsies once a critical squeezed sample size is reached. Beyond frozen section analysis, it enables valid molecular glioma subtyping, allowing faster treatment decisions in the future. Refinement is needed for long-term application.

Overview

  • The study assesses deep-learning algorithms for rapid intraoperative diagnosis from stimulated Raman histology (SRH) images in small stereotactic-guided brain biopsies. It defines a minimum tissue sample size threshold to ensure diagnostic accuracy. A prospective single-center study examined 121 SRH images from 84 patients with unclear intracranial lesions undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy. Unprocessed, label-free samples were imaged with a portable fiber-laser Raman scattering microscope. Three deep-learning models were tested to (I) identify tumorous/non-tumorous tissue as qualitative biopsy control, (II) subclassify into high-grade glioma (CNS WHO grade 4), diffuse low-grade glioma (CNS WHO grade 2-3), metastases, lymphoma, or gliosis, and (III) molecularly subtype IDH- and 1p/19q-status of adult-type diffuse gliomas. Model predictions were evaluated against frozen section analysis and final neuropathological diagnoses. The first model identified tumorous/non-tumorous tissue with 91.7% accuracy. Sample size on slides impacted accuracy in brain tumor subclassification (81.6%, κ=0.72 frozen section; 73.9%, κ=0.61 second model), with SRH being smaller than H&E (4.1±2.5mm² vs 16.7±8.2mm², p<0.001). SRH images with over 140 high-quality patches and a mean squeezed sample of 5.26mm² yielded 89.5% accuracy in subclassification and 93.9% in molecular subtyping of adult-type diffuse gliomas. AI-based SRH image analysis is non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting and subclassifying brain tumors during small stereotactic-guided biopsies once a critical squeezed sample size is reached. Beyond frozen section analysis, it enables valid molecular glioma subtyping, allowing faster treatment decisions in the future. Refinement is needed for long-term application.

Comparative Analysis & Findings

  • The study compared the outcomes observed under different experimental conditions or interventions detailed in the study. The three deep-learning models were tested for accuracy in identifying tumorous/non-tumorous tissue, subclassifying brain tumors, and molecularly subtyping gliomas. The first model identified tumorous/non-tumorous tissue with 91.7% accuracy. Sample size on slides impacted accuracy in brain tumor subclassification, with SRH being smaller than H&E. SRH images with over 140 high-quality patches and a mean squeezed sample of 5.26mm² yielded 89.5% accuracy in subclassification and 93.9% in molecular subtyping of adult-type diffuse gliomas. AI-based SRH image analysis is non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting and subclassifying brain tumors during small stereotactic-guided biopsies once a critical squeezed sample size is reached. Beyond frozen section analysis, it enables valid molecular glioma subtyping, allowing faster treatment decisions in the future. Refinement is needed for long-term application.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The study's findings have significant implications for the field of research or clinical practice. AI-based SRH image analysis is non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting and subclassifying brain tumors during small stereotactic-guided biopsies once a critical squeezed sample size is reached. Beyond frozen section analysis, it enables valid molecular glioma subtyping, allowing faster treatment decisions in the future. However, refinement is needed for long-term application. Future research directions could explore the use of AI-based SRH image analysis in larger biopsies, in other types of brain tumors, and in combination with other imaging modalities. Additionally, further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of AI-based SRH image analysis in clinical practice.